This page is currently under construction. As the experiments and modifications to my knee brace continues, I will add details as they become available.
Can knee braces prevent injury, or help prevent future injuries during rehabilitation? I have found no evidence to support this contention. In fact, in some case studies, soft braces performed better than rigid braces. That is not to say, that a better functioning ridged brace cannot be designed. It may be that ridged braces have a limited degree of motion (usually only two). In contrast, soft braces have compliance and therefore have more degrees of freedom. It is often reported by brace wearers that the other supporting muscles and structures around the knee become week due to lack of movement (a brace that is engineered towards stability). An ideal brace system should have all the degrees of freedom seen in normal natural knee movements, but limit excessive movements that could cause injury. Often in engineering, we tend to "reinvent the wheel", someone else has invariably already come up with a solution. The best candidate in my opinion would be a four bar system with spherical bearings that could then offer an increased number of degrees of freedom. A brace system of this type is already available from Asterisk. In the first part of this analysis, studies are made into the geometry, dynamics and kinematics of the Asterisk brace system.

Kinematics of the knee
Animations of the knee flexing, viewed from the lateral and medial sides respectively are show below.
Can knee braces prevent injury, or help prevent future injuries during rehabilitation? I have found no evidence to support this contention. In fact, in some case studies, soft braces performed better than rigid braces. That is not to say, that a better functioning ridged brace cannot be designed. It may be that ridged braces have a limited degree of motion (usually only two). In contrast, soft braces have compliance and therefore have more degrees of freedom. It is often reported by brace wearers that the other supporting muscles and structures around the knee become week due to lack of movement (a brace that is engineered towards stability). An ideal brace system should have all the degrees of freedom seen in normal natural knee movements, but limit excessive movements that could cause injury. Often in engineering, we tend to "reinvent the wheel", someone else has invariably already come up with a solution. The best candidate in my opinion would be a four bar system with spherical bearings that could then offer an increased number of degrees of freedom. A brace system of this type is already available from Asterisk. In the first part of this analysis, studies are made into the geometry, dynamics and kinematics of the Asterisk brace system.